Aquatics & Air Quality

The Canary in the Mine
Aquatics & Stainless Steel

By W.T. (Tom) Sinclair, P.E.

Last fall Sinclair & Associates Inc. was shortlisted and ultimately won a contract with the Greenville County (S.C.) Recreation District for the study and renovation of an aging aquatic facility. Each team interviewed was challenged by board member Randy Baxter, an ASCA Level II swim coach, as well as an aerospace design engineer, on how they would address the chloramines problem.

"Owners spend hundreds of thousands of dollars on dehumidification systems without solving the chloramines problem," Baxter said. "It just doesn't make sense. The best air in the building is the air at the top, the worst is just above the pool water. Why would you want to mix the two? It seems to me there ought to be a way to exhaust this heavily concentrated, chloramines-laden air through the gutter without contaminating the good air."

Not being one to shy away from a challenge, but at the same time realizing my lack of knowledge in this area, my response was, "I don't know, but if it can be solved, we'll figure out a way to do it."

Baxter had actually given the answer: remove the contaminated air before it pollutes the "good" air. Consultant Tom Lee of Paddock Pool Equipment Co. returned to his office, and put his team to work.

The evidence backing Baxter's charge is astounding. Chloramines are compounds formed by a chemical reaction between free chlorine and organic compounds (sweat, urine, body oils, etc.) in the water. The chloramines out-gas to produce an unpleasant, unhealthy, corrosive environment. Aquatics experts have warned of the corrosive effects of natatorium environments.

Is the entire aquatic industry missing the warnings the stainless steel is trying to give them? Stainless steel is designed to withstand chemicals, heat and water. Corrosion stains on the "stainless steel" in the aquatic facility are like the canaries in the mines of old. When the canary died suddenly, it warned the miners the air was bad and they needed to get out. Changing materials to hide the corrosion is like substituting a stuffed parrot for the live canary—no one benefits; it's just a cover-up.

Chloramines-laden air is bad for your health. The evidence is irrefutable. Respiratory problems such as "lifeguard lung" and asthma are common maladies for anyone in chloramines-laden environments for long periods:

  • Industry and health studies state that 25 percent or more Olympic swimmers have asthma or other respiratory distresses. Many swimmers on the U.S. team use inhalers daily.
  • On Dec. 26, 2006, a child in Nebraska was in intensive care for respiratory problems after swimming in a motel indoor pool. Some 254 persons became ill from that experience with the outbreak attributed to toxic levels of chloramines in the air.
  • Some swim meets are being suspended due to high levels of chloramines. Recently, an Atlanta swim center sent a girl to the hospital during a meet due to breathing difficulties. A team sent to the site to measure the chloramines level in the air found it to be 0.85 mg/m?. Currently, no exposure limits exist for airborne chloramines, however, World Health Organization (WHO) recommends a concentration of 0.5 mg/m? as a provisional value.

We spend millions on buildings for aesthetics, comfort and economy, but air quality has suffered. More air changes (high energy cost), "shocking the pool" (increases the problem) and ozone or UV disinfectant systems (addresses water, not air) are not the solution. Chloramines (specifically trichloramines) are heavier than air and tend to form a "bubble" in the meter or so above the water surface. Using the theory, "The solution to pollution is dilution," we stir the air. By ASHRAE standards, we exhaust 10 percent, usually high on the walls or in the ceiling, and the polluted air condenses on building surfaces, inside ductwork, inside HVAC equipment and inside lungs. Deterioration commences immediately. Our evaluation of the 17-year-old Greenville, S.C., facility revealed it had deteriorated to the stage it was structurally deficient and more costly to repair than to replace.

Installation in the Test Facility

In response to Baxter's challenge, a system was developed to remove the humid, chloramines-laden air at deck or water level and exhaust it from the pool envelope. A prototype system was installed at the six-lane Rock Hill (S.C.) YMCA pool, a facility with a reputation for very poor pool area air quality. A team of chemists from a major university determined the baseline chloramines level during normal operations, and then found a 51 percent reduction in the chloramines level with the new system in operation.

Each facility is slightly different and will require its own solution, including sizing of the system and balancing dehumidification and ventilation to provide the best swimming environment. As we have progressed in the understanding of airborne chloramines extraction, we can project even more benefits:

  • Reduced maintenance costs and extended useful building life.
  • Increased HVAC equipment life.
  • Reduced dehumidification loads .
  • Improved times for competitive swimmers as they breathe more oxygen-rich air instead of chloramines-laden air.
The Future

The recently enacted Virginia Graeme Baker Act mandated safety modifications to the suction components of public pools. With the preponderance of evidence of the negative health impact of chloramines-laden air, we should expect a similar directive to clean the air.

Registered professional engineers subscribe to a code of ethics. The health, safety and welfare of the public are paramount. As consultants, we cannot ignore air quality or blame it on others. We cannot do what we did in the past. Each project is unique and requires analysis to determine the proper approach to achieve good air quality and reasonable operating costs. Sinclair & Associates' policy is for all indoor pools to include a chloramine-removing system, and only delete it upon direction of the client who accepts responsibility for the consequences. I applaud aquatic consultants who are willing to step up, learn and embrace technology to design a safe, green, healthy, cost-effective swim environment. The benefits are too great to ignore, and the cost of not using it will be obsolescence the day the facility opens.

As I said to Baxter and the Greenville County Recreation District, "If it can be solved, we'll figure out a way to do it." We will heed the warning of the "canary in the mine."



ABOUT THE AUTHOR

W.T. (Tom) Sinclair, P.E., is president of Sinclair & Associates Inc., an engineering, architectural and surveying services firm in South Carolina. With more than 35 years of experience in engineering and more than 15 years in aquatic design, Tom has been heavily involved in the development process of The Evacuator, from Paddock Pool Equipment. For more information, visit www.sinclair-inc.net and www.paddockindustries.com.




© Copyright 2019 Recreation Management. All rights reserved.